link1965 link1966 link1967 link1968 link1969 link1970 link1971 link1972 link1973 link1974 link1975 link1976 link1977 link1978 link1979 link1980 link1981 link1982 link1983 link1984 link1985 link1986 link1987 link1988 link1989 link1990 link1991 link1992 link1993 link1994 link1995 link1996 link1997 link1998 link1999 link2000 link2001 link2002 link2003 link2004 link2005 link2006 link2007 link2008 link2009 link2010 link2011 link2012 link2013 link2014 link2015 link2016 link2017 link2018 link2019 link2020 link2021 link2022 link2023 link2024 link2025 link2026 link2027 link2028 link2029 link2030 link2031 link2032 link2033 link2034 link2035 link2036 link2037 link2038 link2039 link2040 link2041 link2042 link2043 link2044 link2045 link2046 link2047 link2048 link2049 link2050 link2051 link2052 link2053 link2054 link2055 link2056 link2057 link2058 link2059 link2060 link2061 link2062 link2063 link2064 link2065 link2066 link2067 link2068 link2069 link2070 link2071 link2072 link2073 link2074 link2075 link2076 link2077 link2078 link2079 link2080 link2081 link2082 link2083 link2084 link2085
конспект лекций, вопросы к экзамену

Simile. The difference between simile and metaphor.

Simile is a trope which draws an imaginative comparison between the explicit tenor (T) and vehicle (V) foregrounding one or more points of resemblance, i. e. tertiumcomparationis (TC), the comparison being expressed by a special connective (C)

S. G. Darian offers the following matrix of distinctive features of simile: The air conditioner (T) at the window, soft (TC), like (C) the hum of men at prayer (V).

  1. T and V are unlike things.
  2. T and V have different referents.
  3. There is no direct or simple comparison of obvious similarities or likenesses.
  4. T and V share some semantic features (TC).
  5. Simile does not invole a total transfer of features.
  6. The simile contains a connective, С
  7. The two parts of a simile can be fitted into the paradigm T is like V.
  8. The connective, C, affirms that the relationship is an imaginary one, an appearance, a resemblance, rather than reality.
  9. V usually refers to a general rather than specific item, a museum, not the museum (48, 50).

TertiumComparationis. TC is sometimes stated by a special word, from almost any part of speech:

  1. Verb . .his nose curved like a switchback, with a knob at the end. (Woolf)
  2. Noun: I took on the project with the enthusiasm of a child going to his first haircut, (quoted in 48)
  3. Adjective. Jim stopped inside the door as immovable as a setter at the scent of quail. (0. Henry)
  4. Adverb: Each of the lines stands sturdily like a tree, (quoted in 48)

D. U. Ashurova classifies similes into four groups depending on the nature of TC (the examples are quoted in this work):—

  1. Of quality: A woman moved is like fountain troubled: muddy, ill-seeming, bereft of beauty. (Shakespeare)
  2. Of action: The clerks in the office jumped about like sailors during a storm. (0. Henry)
  3. Of relation: Her anger dispersed before his humour like foam before a breeze. (Kleiser)
  4. Of analogy: As on the fingers of throned queen The basest jewel will be well esteemed, So are those errors that in thee are seen To truths translated and for true things deemed. (Shakespeare)

32. The difference between simile, metaphor and metonymy.

Simile is a trope which draws an imaginative comparison between the explicit tenor (T) and vehicle (V) foregrounding one or more points of resemblance, i. e. tertiumcomparationis (TC), the comparison being expressed by a special connective (C).

Metaphor is an imaginative identification of one concept (the tenor) with another (the vehicle) and the resultant breach of normal correspondence between concepts and words. There is no doubt that the basis of metaphor is the mental process of comparison, of „similation", but unlike in simile, in metaphor the overt ground of likeness is never verbalized.

Metonymy is a trope in which the name of a thing is replaced by the name of an associated, contiguous thing. Unlike metaphor where the interaction between tenor and vehicle is based on resemblance, metonymy reflects the actually existing relations between the tenor and the vehicle whose interaction is thus based on their contiguity.